Recently
I had the (mis?)fortune of coming across an article on Aeon Magazine,
which questions if the human progress has come to a halt. The writer
laments that nothing ground-breaking has happened in technology for
the past 40 odd years. Actually this in no way news to me. Long time
ago in my student years I came across Kary Mullis (PCR man) ranting
just that - “the so called war on cancer has been a damp squib''.
Ah, true. And so are all the anti-psychotic drugs, and whatnot
people are told to lo and behold. In those student days of mine, there was big talk on being forever young (New Scientist cover story), forages of artificial intelligence, elixir just around the corner of local fish & chips, ad infinitum. Put it this way, its all bunk. I
could say that, because having attended a funeral AND a birthday in
span of less than one Earth revolution one just gets around to
reflect on life, universe, and everything. 42 of course is the answer
– whereupon 44 is the approximate answer – like the kid who wrote
665.9 as the approximate number of the beast...
Then
again, I am not at all surprised with where we have gotten to –
considering the state of education among youth today. Maybe it's the
way people see things whence they are over the hill – whole history
is a series of complaints in a nut-shell. If you are interested,
Plato lamented “Our youth now love luxury. They have bad
manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for their
elders and love chatter in place of exercise..........”; while
Cicero also did the same – if my stupid teachers at school got
around to teach me right. Well, it's nothing new is it? Coming around
(getting around?) Simon Jenkins was on London Times justifying
baby-Killer Blair's educational reforms. Exactly what are those
reforms? They were taking away math and science from the kids, Blair & his crony David Blunkett. Silly man was not content with his own blindness but sought to blind the youth of his day as well. Mr
Jenkins (sounds like a sheep sh......r to me) says he was compelled
to study Trigonometry and Latin and whatnot at his public school –
but none of those had ever been useful in his life – ever. True. Who the hell said it was all for use? For love of Jove, school education is not a corporate training programme intended to squeeze last bit of usefulness (productivity) out of kids. Idiot.
As
much as I myself lament HIS youth at an English public school without
toilet doors, I can equally sympathise with current youth who are
deprived of classical education. Maybe Plato foresaw this – whence
he said “they no longer rise when elders enter the room; they
contradict their parents, chatter before company; gobble up their
food and tyrannize their teachers” - who wants to respect
teachers who can't teach crap in the first place (and the parents who
can't afford public schools!). Lets take a recent example here –
just to give you all an idea of what youth today are like. I was
asked to help out a friend's young daughter recently. She is such a
vivacious lass with a name to match – charming name that is, alas,
for all that potential, the kid could not comprehend a modicum of Latin – not
a phrase, not a word, not a even an abbreviation. Never mind French
or Sanskrit or any other civilised language. Nothing. I once came
across in a book (The Dam Busters, I think) about a pilot in WWII
whom the British air control was desperately trying to communicate
with – but the writer says “He appeared to speak no known human
language”. Thought that was an exaggeration – till I met this
kid!
Put it this way, this girl is surely a lucky one. Because if Plato, or for that matter anyone else from that side of history before the advent of holy computers, got around to meeting her they'd sure wring her lovely neck in desperation. You can leave Latin out of this - but Sanskrit? Surely they are exposed to that language around here, and it's not speaking dead languages I am on about in here. You don't have to be a cunning linguist (ha ha I got you) to see the point.
Put it this way, this girl is surely a lucky one. Because if Plato, or for that matter anyone else from that side of history before the advent of holy computers, got around to meeting her they'd sure wring her lovely neck in desperation. You can leave Latin out of this - but Sanskrit? Surely they are exposed to that language around here, and it's not speaking dead languages I am on about in here. You don't have to be a cunning linguist (ha ha I got you) to see the point.
If
we go on like this, we will have no future left. Utile dulci will
become our motto – because there is no tomorrow, Memento mori
shall be our religion because there is no cure for diseases, and that
verse on some books can be read as Domi Mina Nus Tia Illu Mia!!!
Now
go decipher this – it is on Sir Christopher Wren's tomb: "Lector,
si monumentum requiris, circumspice"
PS You can Google for that, which is better than knowing Latin sometimes.
PS You can Google for that, which is better than knowing Latin sometimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment